Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Bug Soup

     "I thought you said this soup wouldn't have bugs," I said, scooping black specks out of the broth.
     "That's pepper," my mother answered.
     My brother, Carmine, looked up from his bowl.  "Then why do they have legs?"
     "Don't be silly," she answered.
     "And eyes," my sister added.
     "Shut the hell up, and eat the goddam food," my father said, his fist clenched, his voice cracking.
     "Yeah, eat it," said David, the brother who was always placating my father.  "It's dee-licious!  Watch me!" and he motioned to his soup spoon, into which he had amassed dozens of weevils, floating like dead men alongside globules of fat.  He opened his mouth wide, and poured the spoonful onto his tongue.  "See?  Good!  Protein!"
     "Jesus!" my father said, casting a sidelong glance at David.  But you could see he took satisfaction in this stalwart 11-year-old, whose role in the family was to amuse, and defuse, with the goal of keeping us from getting hit.  Sometimes it worked,  My father needed admiration, and David gave it to him.  But the rest of us didn't, and we paid the price.  I would have preferred an out-and-out revolution, but children didn't do that sort of thing.
     I separated the weevils from the rest of my soup, lining them up on the paper napkin under my fork.  It was a mild form of rebellion, but it didn't go unnoticed.
     "Who the hell do you think you are?  The Queen of Sheba?  Shovel it in!" he shouted, raising his hand to strike.  "Goddam insubordination!"
     "Tony, please..."
     Then he was out of his chair, an emperor of a man with huge hands and a red face, looming over the table.  All six of us ducked, instinctively.
     But this time we'd lucked out:  my father's heavy footfall could be heard heading first for the screen door, which slammed behind him, and then to his Cadillac, which screeched out of the drive.  He wouldn't' be back until close to midnight--"What is he doing out so late?  I'd ask, and my mother answered, "Business"-- when we'd be hiding out in our rooms, safe...maybe.
     Why were there always bugs in our soup and spaghetti?
     It has to do with rotating food.
     Isn't it a rule that when you buy groceries you put the newest purchases behind the older ones?  This is fine if you don't shop until you've gone through most of your stock.  But if you keep enormous quantities of packaged goods in your pantry, as my parents did, in case of catastrophe, the food at the front is likely to be very old.
     Therefore, in our house, the next bag of Pennsylvania Dutch egg noodles was invariably infested with weevils, and the raisins hosted hoards of worms.  If you were hungry enough you didn't see them until the third or fourth bite.  And, in truth, they didn't affect the taste of the raisins, which in any case had become gritty from aging fructose.  It was an aesthetic problem, and with some foods the yuckiness is an American phenomenon.  Maybe it shouldn't have bothered me, but it did.
     There's that famous Sardinian cheese, casu marzu, which is best eaten when the maggots, which have digestive enzymes that help ferment and acidify the cheese, are still squirming about.  Their presence means the cheese is still "alive."  And the French "Mimolette" has a crust that is infested with mites:  their burrows allow air to reach the soft interior.  The Germans have a similar cheese, called Milbenkaese.  These traditional foods are unknown in America, where we pasteurize and ultra-pasteurize everything.  There may even be an American law against selling wormy cheese.
     But there isn't one against weevils.  Once you have them in your pantry, you have to throw everything out at once and wash down the shelves with vinegar-water, otherwise every new product you buy will be invited to the weevil party.
     My parents--a doctor and a dentist--made decent incomes.  Yet, they couldn't bring themselves to throw out food--that would be "a waste."  And they stockpiled such large quantities that nothing we ate was ever fresh.  My mother cooked whatever was next in the line-up, night after night, weevils and worms and all.  She used the bug-ridden noodles, rice, and raisins not only because she couldn't bear to waste them but because my father, an exacting paterfamilias and someone who counted all the packages, insisted on it. 
     My mother bowed out, however, when it came to eating it.  Sometimes she made herself a can of Campbell's soup, saying her stomach felt queasy.  More often, she had a cheese sandwich and hot Lipton's tea.
     "This soup is disgusting," I said, once my father was out of the drive.
     "Don't be ridiculous," she reprimanded.  "It's good."
     "Then why aren't you eating it?"
     "I do, sometimes."
     "Why can't we be like other families?" I asked.
     "I don't know what in the world you mean," she answered stiffly.
     "I don't want to eat bugs."
     "You'll do as you're told, young lady."
     When do we stop puzzling over our parents and their absurdities? 
     Their way of life becomes a template for us:  we either adopt it or reject it, but we always respond to it, as though it were a first stepping-stone, a launch-pad. 
     One thing I've learned, after listening to thousands of patients' stories (because everyone obsesses over parents), is that there aren't "other families," as in "Why can't we be like other families?" 
     There isn't a norm, or a perfect family, or an average person.  We're all looney, just below the surface.  Looney is the norm.
     I live in the south, home of weevils, where everyone stores flour in the refrigerator.  Noodles, too, and rice, and raisins--if they're smart.  Nevertheless, every once in a while I am surprised by telltale black specks in my pasta water, swirling in the foam, just before it boils. 
     I admit, there's a part of me that doesn't want to dump out the whole pot and start all over.  "What a waste," I say to myself, and am reminded of my parents. 
     Then, I refuse.  "I don't want to eat bugs."
     Feeling like a rebel, I put together cheese sandwiches for dinner, and brew a pot of hot tea.
   
     
    

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Curtis Fallgatter and Me

     I write this as a warning to anyone who may be thinking of retaining Curtis Fallgatter to represent him or her in a lawsuit. 
     This is the story of my experience with Mr. Fallgatter, and it isn't a good one.
     I borrowed $20,000 from a friend to retain Mr. Fallgatter, and I told him it was all I had. 
     My clinic had been raided and all my cash seized by the government.  I needed a lawyer who could petition the court for an emergency hearing, asking for three things:  1) to get my patients' records given back;  2) to return some cash, so I could pay salaries and bills;  and 3) to unseal affidavits so I might know why my clinic had been raided.
     "It's a pretty simple motion to file," one lawyer told me.  "Standard business."
     Mr. Fallgatter turned "simple" into a mountain, and then started to scale it.
     Within five days of being hired he had spent $21,000.  But he didn't bother to tell me--he knew I would have dismissed him then and there. 
     Wouldn't you fire a lawyer who spent $21,000 in five days, for a routine job?
     Mr. Fallgatter told me at the outset that he would be available to write and defend the motion I needed, and he understood it was an emergency.  He also said he had experience in healthcare law. 
     But, in fact, he knew very little about healthcare, and depended on me to teach him.  In the course of explaining how a clinic works, via emails to him, I ended up writing most of the legal document we filed myself, because he copied and pasted what I sent him directly into the motion.
     Mr. Fallgatter drove 45 miles to see my clinic, once-- then, en route, he told me he had two other people with him--another lawyer and a detective, added to my payroll.  They spent that day doing work one person could have done--and soliciting free advice from me about their personal medical issues.
     Two weeks later, hen the Motion for an Emergency Hearing was completed Mr. Fallgatter told me he wouldn't file it at the courthouse. 
     "Why not?"
     "You have an outstanding balance."
     "I do?  Why didn't you tell me?"
     "My secretary must be behind on her billing."
     "How much?"
     "You owe $26,000 more."
     "$46,000 to write this motion?  Are you kidding?  It's only been two weeks."
     "I worked hard for you!  Don't you think I did a good job?"
     "I'll file the motion myself.  Please withdraw from the case."
     "Don't you think I did a good job?  I did a good job for you.  I worked hard."
     "You need to withdrawal from the case first thing in the morning, and I'll file the motion myself."
     But Mr. Fallgatter didn't withdraw from the case.  
     As it turns out, he hadn't even entered an appearance, so he wouldn't have had to withdraw--but I didn't know that then.  He declined to tell me, because he wanted to stay on my case so he could continue to bill.
     The next day, when he said he wasn't withdrawing, I told him to file the motion immediately--which takes minutes to do.  Turns out,  I couldn't file it myself, because of a rule he hadn't mentioned, that an individual can't represent a corporation.   
     When I looked at the motion he ended up filing, it was different from the "final draft" he had sent me.  Mr. Fallgatter had changed it without telling m, by inserting a request that the judge schedule my "emergency" hearing two weeks later, so he could go on vacation. 
     "You didn't tell me you had a vacation planned!"
     "My niece is getting married."
     "Therefore, you knew about it when I hired you."
     "Yes, well, I did."
     "Why didn't you tell me."
     "It must have slipped my mind."
     "But my situation is urgent.  You should have told me you wouldn't be here."
     "We have a date for the hearing--aren't you glad?"
     "No!  The judge would have scheduled it in a day or two, if it hadn't been for your request--and you changed the motion behind my back.  This makes my 'emergency' look like a joke."
     What kind of "emergency" can wait several weeks?
     I tried to file a motion for an earlier hearing, but it wasn't accepted--by now, Mr. Fallgatter was the attorney of record.
     Therefore, I was forced to close my clinic for two weeks. Without funds, I couldn't pay my staff.  Mr. Fallgatter didn't even have a partner he could substitute in order for the hearing could proceed earlier.  He had a good time at his niece's wedding in Maryland.
     At the hearing a few weeks later, Mr. Fallgatter failed to convince the judge of the merits of my requests.  The FBI got to keep the reasons for the raid secret, they kept the clinic's medical charts, and didn't return any funds
     The hearing took six hours.  Afterward, Mr. Fallgatter said his bill had ballooned to $86,000.  Therefore, I now owed him $66,000.   Perhaps he's planning another vacation--a trip or two around the world.
     His invoices made no sense.  My two current lawyers, who had been present at the hearing in preparation for substituting for Mr. Fallgatter immediately afterward, looked at the charges and said they were outrageous--an embarrassment to the legal profession.
     Mr. Fallgatter has been counting on the fact that I am under terrific stress.  He assumed I would pay--even a huge sum--just to get him out of the way.  "I did a good job!" and "You have the money!  I know you have it!" he kept saying, to justify the bill. 
     For the past year, his partner has been representing him in his lawsuit to get money from me.  Mr. Fallgatter has arranged things so that his expenditures are minimal, and mine are big.  That's why he's doing this.  He doesn't have a lot to lose, but he can make me spend more on my defense against him.
     Would I recommend Curtis Fallgatter to anyone?  No.  Would I say he is fair, honest, and sensitive?  No.  Does he communicate about matters of importance to his client, such as his availability or the massive accumulation of charges?  No.  Does he care about money more than anything?  I'd better not comment--we have a hearing set for April.
     Even if I happened to be Donald Trump, no ethical lawyer would triple-bill for services, or inflate the amount of work he's been hired to do, or conceal his charges way past depletion of the retainer, until they become unaffordable. 
     A lawyer shouldn't refuse to withdraw from a case when he's fired, nor should he fail to tell his client he hasn't even entered an appearance.  A good lawyer doesn't take advantage of his client's misfortune to maximize his own profits--any more than a doctor should charge eight and a half times as much as is customary and reasonable for chemotherapy, just because he believes his patient, who has cancer, will feel desperate enough to borrow the money, and can be browbeaten into paying.
     Two lawyers have told me not to write about this, it might "hurt my case" at trial, where we're headed in April (a spurious attempt at mediation didn't work, last week).  Another two have said it's fine to write--Fallgatter has been unethical, and people should be warned.  The lawyer, Kiyonaga, who recommended Fallgatter in the first place, is angry because I wrote about him in my blog, after he rode in on his white steed and said he'd help but in fact hauled off a retainer of his own without even reading the pleadings on the case-- then disappeared with the booty.  Two more said I ought to file a complaint with the Florida Bar.  Another told me not to write to the Bar, because its members don't handle disputes over money. 
     But this is more than a dispute over money.  It's about someone kicking a client who's been wounded, instead of helping, and rifling through the pockets of the client's jacket on the battlefield, taking as much cash as possible, not what's been earned.  It's about a lawyer petitioning for a case to be heard in his home town, where the judge might be a friend, and repeating like a broken music box that he's worked hard, and deserves all that money, when the motion itself doesn't look that valuable.  It's about a lawyer thinking he can get away with all this, because it's worked, I suppose, in the past. 
     Let's hope that the judges here can act with integrity--since lawyers like Fallgatter can't.
  

Monday, March 4, 2013

Purple Martins

     It's March in Florida:  time to put up your boxes for purple martins.  After they complete their arduous migration trip from Brazil, these birds depend entirely on human support for their survival in Florida.
     Which raises an important question.  To what extent should we be supporting populations that can't support themselves?  How much should we override Darwinian mechanics, which has functioned for millennia to keep organisms adapted to the material constraints of our planet, and when should we cave in and say, "Sorry, if you can't make it on your own, you're doomed"?
     After all, it costs something for us to take care of handicapped species.  And when it costs so much that the survival of other species might be threatened by our intervention, we have to put on the breaks, don't we?  Otherwise, we'll upset the whole "balance of nature."
     Isn't this a question that has plagued civilization for centuries?  How far should our humanism go?  It's a political question--the one about "entitlement spending."  Should those of us who work and pay taxes keep on funding those of us who don't, or can't, or won't?  How many disabled people can a population handle, before it caves in?
     It's a parental question, too.  At what point do you stop feeding and housing your grown kids, and tell them instead to get jobs, fly the coop, give you a break, make it on their own?  Aren't they duty-bound to "give back to society"?  You know you can't support them forever, because you're going to get old and die. 
     And it's a problem of thresholds in nature.  How much Spanish moss can a Live Oak handle before the deleterious effects--reduction of sunlight and an increase in wind resistance--prove fatal to the host tree?  How many fleas can a dog support before it succumbs to blood loss and histamine overload?  How many weeds will strangle your productive garden plants?  How many barnacles can a turtle tote on its shell before the extra weight causes the whole shebang to collapse?
     Thus, we arrive at the question of purple martins.
     In the south, these birds depend completely on humans to provide specific shelters for nesting, so they can lay eggs and reproduce the species.  You and I will put up purple martin boxes, situating them in wide-open areas because the birds have to swoop from far off to make a proper landing at the 2 1/8-inch entrance holes of their houses.  (The holes must be cut no bigger--or starlings and screech owls will take over--nor can they be smaller, because the pregnant martins won't fit.)  The poles on which the nesting boxes are perched must be 10 to 20 feet high, with entrance holes one inch above the floor.  The boxes have to be 30 feet from trees and buildings, to allow the birds long aerial landing strips, with owl-guards to prevent owl, hawk and crow intrusions.  In addition, the poles must be fitted with pole-guards to keep predators like snakes, raccoons and squirrels from scurrying up for a quick meal of chicks and eggs.  The boxes must have inner compartments that are five to seven inches high,  and six by six across, with four or six rooms to a house, because martins prefer to live in colonies.
     Okay, that's a lot of requirements, but we can meet them.  Except...
     Here's the tough one.  When the inevitable non-martin birds arrive to claim your purple martin boxes, you have to chase them off and kill them.  That's right, kill them!
     This means if you want purple martins in your backyard, you must be prepared to kill the house sparrows, European starlings, tree swallows, Eastern bluebirds, and great crested flycatchers who take a liking to those cute little boxes you've constructed with care.  Otherwise, the purple martins won't have a place to live, and will die off in Florida, because they can't defend their houses without help, and they can't procure their own housing--not in the southern United States.  (In the deserts of Arizona, martins live in abandoned woodpecker holes in cactuses, therefore don't need human support.)
     Okay, that's a lot to ask of a bird-friendly, nature-loving, ecologically-minded person.  It's a lot to ask of me.  I have five purple martin boxes, but I can't stomach the ultimatum endorsed by the purple martin organization, that if I'm not prepared to kill swallows and sparrows, I shouldn't put up the martin boxes at all.  The purple martin experts say I won't be doing these vulnerable birds any favors.
     Is this how the anti-entitlement politicians think?  We have to sacrifice some people, they might as well be saying, and it's not going to be the survivors, not in a survival-of-the-fittest world.  Should we let people starve, if they can't earn money to pay for their own food?  Are we to let them die of diseases we could cure, if we covered the cost?  What's the threshold of support we can manage, as a population, before we all collapse, like barnacle-laden turtles?
     Should I kill my lovely, hardy swallows and sparrows, so the purple martins can make it?      

Sunday, March 3, 2013

My Mother's Freezers

      Freud was right, whether he put it in these terms or not:  you can't escape your mother.  Good or bad, happy or sad, present or absent, alive or dead, your mother--or, more accurately, who you think your mother is, and was--determines you who you are.
     Therefore, it's a worthwhile expenditure of time to sort out, however meagerly, some of your mother's quirks, especially the ones that really stand out. 
      For example, my 86-year-old mother, who has only herself to feed, owns two family-sized refrigerators and three freezers, all stuffed so full that when she opens the doors things tumble onto the floor.   She could break a toe, except that she knows to step out of the way at just the right moment.
     One of her friends jokes about her "need" to have three dozen eggs on hand at all times--but I remember when it used to be five dozen, so she's getting better.  Her friend knows this is as far as the joking can go.  My mother requires back-up food even when, strictly speaking, it isn't edible any more.  She can't be persuaded to retire her freezers on the basis of thriftiness.  A single freezer costs about $35 a month in electric bills--which is a lot, she'd agree, but she won't talk about it.  Too disturbing.
     She used to have five freezers, including two mammoth deep-freeze models which held so much she couldn't have reached items at the bottom, not even by torquing her entire, now-arthritic frame into one of the frosty, dark vaults.  She might guess what's in her freezers, but she doesn't really know.  What matters is that they're loaded with what used to be food.
     Some of the items in the freezers are twenty-five years old.  Mostly it's meat:  pork shoulders encased in thick ice, chuck roasts sliding under brittle, broken plastic, Omaha steaks with such bad freezer-burn they're shriveled to half-size.  There are veal patties and chickens, lobsters and shrimp, the necks, chops, ribs, sides and butts of various mammals, and lots of ground meat.  Meat is valuable, which is why my mother keeps it.  It makes her feel secure.
     My mother doesn't eat $35 of meat per month, let alone three times that, so it's not a matter of economics--which is otherwise of paramount importance, for instance when it comes to getting a good deal on yard work, or paying someone less than $20 to clean her roof gutters, or arguing with the plumber about the price of a repair.  If she really wanted to save money, she'd get rid of her freezers.  But that would cost too much, and I'm not talking about dollars and cents. 
     Change happens slowly, but at least it happens.  Ten years ago, I'll vouch, my mother owned five freezers, and forty years ago, when we were a family of eight, we had six.  It might have made sense to bank on so much storage, had we lived in the wilderness, but growing up, our house was only minutes from Acme, A & P, and Shop Rite, where the supplies of food seemed limitless.  And we had more than freezers:  our cellar shelves were stocked like a bomb shelter, with rows and rows of institutional-size cans of food.
     One of my first childhood memories is of cleaning up cans of chicken fricassee and Bing cherries, which had exploded onto the shelves and floors of the cellar.
     Do most people know that if you keep cans of food long enough, they blow up?
     The giant cans must have been ten or twenty years old, having been bought for very cheap at The Bargain Center, where my father had an "in" with the owner, George.  Whenever Joe had surplus food, especially if it was past the expiration date, my father (who didn't believe in expiration dates) bought it.  "I got this for pennies on the dollar," he'd brag.  George understood, because he, too, had grown up on the "south side" of town.  He made a living by buying up bent and damaged cans and packages that had fallen from trains, or been retrieved from trucking accidents, and selling them at steep discounts.  His bargain store was nothing more than an excuse for stocking up on large quantities of food, which he required, like my parents, to keep internalized terror internal.
     The stockpiles of canned goods--and the overstuffed freezers--were a bulwark for us against another Great Depression.  It didn't seem to matter that the economy was booming.  It didn't matter, either, that the tops of the cans we hoarded were convex, bloating up, or that the seams wouldn't hold a can opener any more.  "They're still good," my father declared, and no one challenged him--he wasn't the kind of man you challenged.  When we chose a can for dinner--it had to be a bloated one--there'd be a hiss as the V-opener popped a triangular hole.  We needed to "use those cans up."
     Then, in a single month, a whole series of cans exploded, one after another, splattering all over the walls and ceilings.  My brothers and I would be on the living room floor, reading or playing penny poker, and we'd hear a sound like bottle rockets going off down below. "Who's cleaning it up this time?" one of us would ask, with dread.  That's where my memories begin.
     "God damn it!" my father bellowed each day, calculating the losses.  He thought we should have eaten the food so the cans wouldn't have "gone to waste."  He sniffed around, and decided some of the exploded ones were still edible.  The rest had to be cleaned up.
     That's why parents had kids, in those days:  to do stuff like this.
     Until the day he died, twenty years ago, my father continued to buy canned goods by the case, for cheap because the "Use Before" dates had expired.  He stored the cans in the cellar, against an uncertain future.  Many of them are still there, like a strange form of gold, like the roasts in the freezers, and the chops, and butts, and loins.
     As a child, it seemed normal that the tops of canned goods should be distended by gases brewing inside--until I visited some friends' houses, and saw that none of the neat, individual cans in their pantries were bloated--and they had so few cans in storage.  How were they surviving?  The labels on my friends' mothers' canned goods were shiny and new, too, and the lids weren't rusty or black.  Theirs were Betty Crocker households.  I suppose my friends' parents had other kinds of problems, which had nothing to do with food. 
     That's when I began to understand my family's signature pathology, as compared with the pathology of others.  That's when I started to wonder about my mother.  We ate the food in those gassy cans, and sometimes it smelled like rotten eggs, or a three-days-dead possum that our overweight collie might have deposited on the doormat.  Why would my mother allow this?  How did it happen that her usual discernment failed, when it came to the cases of food my father brought home, and to those awful freezers? 
     I guess kids see things like this about their families, sooner or later.  Sometimes the problems are buried pretty deeply, but in my case, the exploding cans couldn't be hidden, though they were  rationalized.  We're all neurotic, and therefore, we're all the same.  But our neuroses have different personalities, like a musical theme with endless variations. My parents' craziness had to do with food, and hunger, and fear.  We thought it was funny, until we had to clean up the messes.  Then we started becoming adults.  Our parents' messes become our messes. 
     We kids were required to clean up the cherry and chicken explosions, and sometimes creamed corn, or Hormel ham, or pork-n-beans.  We used metal buckets, rags and cold water, because plastic containers and paper towels weren't household mainstays.  When I happen to see cans of these foods in the grocery store these days I turn away, nauseated.  I avoid the inner aisles when I shop, for this reason.
     Every day after school, those months, there were several new explosions, each with its characteristic odor.  Our first order of business, before homework, before other chores, was to clean up the messes, throwing what my father considered truly inedible into the woods.  Then, we poured bleach-water on the cement floor and watched it trickle down the drain-holes.
     We offered to pay one another to do our share of the work, trading impossible favors, "I'll clean your shoes, for life," or, "I'll scratch your back, for life," or, "I'll play Monopoly with you, even though you cheat, whenever you want, for life."  We petitioned our mother, "Please don't make me do that job," but she bowed out, saying, "That's your father's project."
     The memory of rank chicken fricassee comes back to me, sometimes, and so do the images of curdled yellow gravy oozing onto my pink flip-flops, and fizzy, soured cherries sticking to the shelf-tops in that musty cellar.  There is terror, too, because my brothers convinced me the cellar was the denizen of monsters and ghosts who lurked in the back crawl-spaces and had probably caused the cans to explode in the first place.  And, don't forget, there was my parents' terror of going hungry, which I was taking in.
     Two years ago, one of my mother's freezers broke.  She hadn't noticed because she doesn't visit the back corner of the garage where her "extra" freezers have been sitting for decades.  My mother never actually goes into the freezers--although she "might," she says, "one day" when she "needs" something. 
     The freezer must have been broken for months.  It's my brother who caught the stench emanating from the garage when he came for a visit.  He informed my mother, who became anxious but allowed him to "handle" it.  He and a friend (whom he had to pay) donned masks and double-gloves to transfer the slimy contents of the freezer, hunk by hunk, into construction clean-up bags and take it all to the dump.  They hauled the empty freezer to a scrap-metal yard.  My brother said it reminded him of the exploding-can years of childhood.  This is why we have siblings:  to remember, and affirm, and say, "Yeah, that was sick."   We have one another to keep ourselves from feeling alone in that neurotic inner-space bequeathed to us, generation after generation.
     My mother didn't replace that freezer, which means she's cleaning up some inner-space of her own.  And we're helping her to work on her other freezers:  "Mom, do you want me to get rid of some of that old food?"  No, I'm not ready.  "Mom, how about throwing out some of those rusty cans in the cellar?"  Don't you touch a thing!  I know what I'm doing.
     Does she?  How would I know?  I have my own things to clean up, and some of them look a lot like hers.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Hey! What's with the Guns, Guys?

     What would you do if the utility guy came to your door to read your meter, and he had a gun in his holster?
     "Wait, let me put on my slippers before I show you where it is," you say, and he pulls the gun on you.
     Or, you reach into the pocket of your bathrobe for a Kleenex--the air blowing through the open door is making your nose run--and he shoots you right through the heart, because you made what he thought was a "wrong move."
     FBI agents, like all police, are trained to shoot to kill.  In some places, police have the benefit of "special training" to override a natural hesitation about killing vulnerable populations.  They practice shooting images of pregnant women, children, and geriatric people until it no longer feels wrong.  Otherwise, they might not pull the trigger fast enough when duty requires it.  The Minnesota-based company providing this training ("Law Enforcement Targets, Inc.")  has contracts with the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security.
     I'm not saying it isn't conceivable that a pregnant woman, or a feeble old man, or a quadriplegic might commit a crime--maybe even one that requires armed police who can kill on the spot to "secure" our "homeland."  But what about the unborn child in that pregnant criminal's belly?  And what if the suspect who gets shot isn't guilty?
     When dozens of armed agents stormed my clinic on June 16, 2011, I wanted to say, "Put away the guns, guys.  No one here is armed."
     Which was true.  Clinic employees don't bring guns to work, even if they do own them.  We're not planning to shoot our patients, nor are we expecting hold-ups or raids.  It's a matter of principle not to bring weapons into a center for healing, but it's also common sense.  There are some places on earth you don't expect to need a gun.
     So, I repeat, "What's with the guns, guys?"  Why did all those agents have to bring their guns, ready to shoot?  Why did one agent hold a gun to a medical assistant's head?  Was the agent feeling threatened?  Had he decided that our "homeland" was "insecure" on that day, because the medical assistant couldn't yank a phlebotomy needle out of a cancer-patient's arm fast enough?  Would one word out of the medical assistant's mouth have cost her her life?
     It's a parenting truism that if you hit a child you teach the child to hit.  If the self-appointed parent-figures in our country, FBI agents and police, take guns everywhere they go, and feel the need to go places they aren't needed, toting their guns, trigger-happy, then the rest of us are going to need guns, too, just to defend ourselves against our "defenders."
     I'm not yet on the side of arguers for the NRA, but I see their point.  Whereas the idea of "maintaining a militia" (our Second Amendment right) for the purpose of defending ourselves as citizens against despotic rulers might have seemed insane to me a few years ago, now it's not so odd.  Funny, what a little experience can do to a person.
     Guns weren't needed when the FBI came to raid my clinic, nor were they required to achieve the government's purposes at Mountain Pure Water, Gibson Guitar, Midamor Meatpacking, or Duncan Outdoors--those other businesses raided at gunpoint. Raids weren't necessary at all, with or without guns, because the only items those agents sought were papers from our files.  There were no hard-core criminals on the premises, no organized crime in progress, no concern about drug dealing, and no weapons. 
     Hey, guys, let's save guns for missions where guns are required, thereby protecting everyone from all of you trigger-happy, trained-to-kill-even-pregnant-women, FBI agents.  If you want papers from our files, you can have them.  You don't need bullet-proof vests, semi-automatic weapons, and all that attitude, just to pick up paperwork.
     And the rest of us tax-paying, law-abiding citizens would like to go home with our lives, whether we're pregnant or not.

Friday, March 1, 2013

Chewy Date Bars

This recipe is quick and practically foolproof.  Great for drop-in guests.  You can cut  the portions it in half, using 3 egg, and a 13 x 9 pan, if you're modest, but you'll miss them when they're gone.

7 large eggs
2 cups sugar
1 tsp vanilla
2 cups flour
2 tsp baking powder
1/2 tsp salt
4 cups chopped dates
2 cups chopped pecans

Whip eggs until foamy.  Add sugar and vanilla, while beating continuously.  Stir in flour, baking powder and salt until well-combined.  Add dates and nuts, and pour into a greased jelly-roll pan.  Bake at 350 degrees for 10 min, then turn oven down to 325 degrees and bake 30 minutes more.  Don't over-bake!

Letters

     Like a person bereaved, I had not had a chance to read the many letters and cards that were mailed or dropped off at the clinic during the weeks when it was taking its last breaths, when it was closing.  
     Now, finally, I am going through the stack of condolence notes like a widow, grateful that other people took the time to say they knew me, or had been to the clinic, and had had a good experience.  The funeral registry is long--here are a few of the comments, from the top of the pile.

     Dr. C.,
          I can never tell you or express what you have done for me.  You have been
     a true blessing to me.  I probably would not be here if it weren't for you.  You
     have saved me in more ways than one.  I appreciate you from the bottom of
     my heart.  I will never forget you or your blessings.  My thoughts and
     prayers will be with you.  God Bless You.  As one of god's angels he will
     reward you.  Thank you for all you have done.  Love, MM
          P.S., If I ever win the Lotto I will look you up.

     Dear Dr. C.,
          I thank you for getting my husband and me together.  We had fourteen
     years, because of you.  I thank you for all your kind words and prayers.  I
     will keep you in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care, RC

     Dr. C.--
         It's very hard for us to say a "good-bye," so we'd like to think after
     15 years we'd keep in touch, somehow.  Thank you for all you've done
     for us and the care you gave us--We will miss you but wish you all the
     very best in the future.  God Bless You and keep you safe, happy, and
     in good health.  Take care and thank you again.  Love DA

     Letter to the Editor:
          I started going to the Colasante Clinic in May because it was the
     nearest one to me that accepted Medicare.  I was pleasantly surprised
     to find that they were also the most competent and considerate medical
     staff that I had ever encountered.
          The fact that the FBI has driven Ona Colasante out of business is an
     unmitigated tragedy for East Gainesville, and a moral lesson in how much
     the federal government is overreaching beyond its constitutional limits.
                                                           Alex Funk, Gainesville Sun, 2/3/13

     Dear Dr. Ona Colasante,
          Please accept this as a gift for yourself.  I was blessed to receive your
     kindness, to treat me.  God Bless You and your famiily.  Thank you.
                                                   Sincerely, Mr. O.

     Dr. Colasante and Group,
          Thank you all for so much good care.  My family and I wish you all
     the best in your future endeavors, and are grateful to have known you and
     been the recipient of your excellent medical care.
                              Our blessings,  KMM

     To All You Wonderful People,
          With a heavy heart I write this note.
          Never in my whole life have I been so lovingly cared for as I have
     been in this office.
          Each of you has given so much of yourselves to all of the patients.  You
     are all angels to me.  In the 12 years I have been cared for by Dr. C and
     her staff, I have never heard a bad word about any of you.  You are all
     terrific people and I wish you all a wonderful, happy, healthy future.
          You all know that God never closes a door without opening a
     window.  A new path for each of you will follow.
          I wish that Dr. C. can fulfill her dream of that special place she is wanting
     for her son.  I know God is watching her and helping her to achieve this.
          I wish for Celeste to follow her dream into the Peace Corps and to
     help many others who need medical attention and the loving hugs she
     often shares.  To Tracy, please keep that happy face and joy in your
     voice.
          I will miss you more than I can say.
                                                                Love,  Mary

     Dr. Ona Colasante,
          Thank you for entrusting me with the care of your patients.  I appreciate
     what you have done.
                                                                Sincerely,    Dr. T.

     Dr. Colasante:
          It's been a pleasure serving you all of these years.  You have meant
     a lot to me and my company.  Thank you for years of allowing me to
     serve you and your patients, alongside you.
          If you ever need anything else in the future, please call.  If you pursue
     your autism home, let me know, as we serve group homes and facilities
     too.
                                                                  Sincerely,   DB

     Dr. C. and Celeste:
          I have been going downhill every since I found out you are closing.
     I have not been able to eat or sleep.
          You have been helping me so much that to know you are leaving is
     like my arm being cut off.
          I am very depressed.
          I saw every doctor in Gainesville, and I have never felt this good.  I
     pray to God to take me because I can't do it without you people.  You
     kept me going where life is worth living.  I only know it's worth living
     because of you.
          I pray for the miracle that you will not close forever.  I don't think I
     can keep going without you.
                                                              Love and thanks, Mrs. W.